<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cottonwood Communications &#187; Frame Relay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/tag/frame-relay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com</link>
	<description>Voice and Data Specialists for your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Frame Relay Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/03/is-frame-relay-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/03/is-frame-relay-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cottonwood Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telesphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  As a WAN technology it seems that the curtains are beginning to close on frame relay. Qwest Communications recently eliminated it&#8217;s promotions on this technology &#8211; making the cost of frame relay almost cost prohibitive for customers.  Today you can get an MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) T-1 with a new programmed Adtran router, installed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/clean-antique-gold-picture-frames-800X800.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-360" title="clean-antique-gold-picture-frames-800X800" src="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/clean-antique-gold-picture-frames-800X800-265x300.jpg" alt="" width="265" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>As a WAN technology it seems that the curtains are beginning to close on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_Relay" target="_blank">frame relay</a>.</p>
<p>Qwest Communications recently eliminated it&#8217;s promotions on this technology &#8211; making the cost of frame relay almost cost prohibitive for customers.  Today you can get an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPLS" target="_blank">MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching)</a> T-1 with a new programmed Adtran router, installed (or delivered to you for a self &#8211; plug and play install at the very least)  for about the same price as you can get a frame relay T-1 (no router).  This was bound to happen, as many companies have already migrated their frame relay networks over to the newer MPLS networks over the last 4-5 years. </p>
<p>With many now using IP PBX phone systems the requirement of a packet switched network with prioritized label capabilities has been essential to running voice as an application on the network.  There are many providers of IP PBX solutions, here&#8217;s one I like in the <a href="http://www.axesscomm.com/voice.html" target="_blank">Rocky Mt. Region</a>.  Another option is to look at a hosted IP PBX from <a href="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/partners/" target="_blank">Teleshere</a>.  For those of you that read the first sentence in this paragraph and shook your head, it&#8217;s OK &#8211; it&#8217;s taken me 20+ years to grasp some of this stuff.  If you ever want to have fun take a look at all of the crazy terms in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=newton+telecom+dictionary&amp;tag=googhydr-20&amp;index=stripbooks&amp;hvadid=1105016681&amp;ref=pd_sl_17farijqpl_b" target="_blank">Newton&#8217;s Telecom Dictionary</a>.  All the acronyms will make your head spin.  The telecommunications and IT industry are number one when it comes to acronym use &#8211; it&#8217;s really another language.</p>
<p>If you have a frame relay network it might be time to analyze and compare cost.  It&#8217;s been my experience that when older technology begins to die, the support for those technologies dies with it.  It&#8217;s no fun to be caught with an old network that&#8217;s not working &#8211; then when you need support the one person that gets it is on vacation.  Get with a good carrier agnostic agency and begin the process to migrate away from Frame Relay - now&#8217;s the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/03/is-frame-relay-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on WAN</title>
		<link>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/01/thoughts-on-wan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/01/thoughts-on-wan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cottonwood Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integra Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point to Point T-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qwest Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TW Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XO Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wide Area Networks or WANs come in many different colors. If you do a Google search for WAN the first recommendation that they give you is Wanda Sykes, or Wanda Syke&#8217;s wife.  If you&#8217;ve never seen or heard a comedy bit from her, it&#8217;s worth while &#8211; she is very funny!  I just found out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Primus_Wan_Chart.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-302 aligncenter" title="Primus_Wan_Chart" src="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Primus_Wan_Chart.gif" alt="" width="510" height="397" /></a></p>
<p>Wide Area Networks or WANs come in many different colors.</p>
<p>If you do a Google search for WAN the first recommendation that they give you is <a href="http://www.wandasykes.com/" target="_blank">Wanda Sykes</a>, or Wanda Syke&#8217;s wife.  If you&#8217;ve never seen or heard a comedy bit from her, it&#8217;s worth while &#8211; she is very funny!  I just found out that there is also a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Association_of_Newspapers" target="_blank">World Association of Newspapers</a> or WAN that was founded in 1948.  Wikipedia says &#8220;that this WAN is a non-profit, non-governmental organization made up of 76 national newspaper associations, 12 news agencies, 10 regional press organizations and individual newspaper executives in 100 countries&#8221;.  Now I&#8217;m thinking back to the many cocktail parties and networking functions that I&#8217;ve attended over the last 20 years wondering if any of the individuals I met thought that I was in that association.  My normal explanation of what I did might have included helping customers with their WANs.  I&#8217;ll have to be careful next time!</p>
<p>Wide Area Networks of WANs in our world is more commonly mentioned as the way in which companies connect their different offices, or LANs (Local Area Networks).  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_Relay" target="_blank">Frame Relay</a> was the first widely used, cloud based technology for WAN.  I&#8217;m surprised when I come across customers that are still using this, but in some more remote areas it is still the best cost option for transmitting data back and forth.</p>
<p>On a local level many have gone to T-1 point to points.  If the majority of your branches, stores or facilities are within the same <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LATA" target="_blank">LATA</a>, this is the most cost efficient way to run your WAN.  If you need more bandwidth you can double or triple your bandwidth by bonding T-1s with the use of your routers to get 3.0 or 4.5 Mb between locations.  The LECs (Local Exchange Carriers &#8211; Qwest, AT&amp;T, Verizon) have made the cost for point to point T-1s so attractive that this is what many customers end up doing.</p>
<p>If your locations are more geographically dispersed and spread out over a larger area, say in 2 or 50 states, you might entertain an MPLS T-1 WAN.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPLS" target="_blank">MPLS, of multi protocol label switching</a> is a way to prioritize traffic.  If you want to run voice over your WAN having an MPLS network is critical.  Many businesses today want all of their offices to get dial tone and voice mail access off the main PBX &#8211; these customers are having dynamic discussions about their WAN and their WAN operability.  If things aren&#8217;t set up properly on the front end, nothing will work correctly.</p>
<p>Within the last 4-5 years the new game for WAN is ethernet.  Without a doubt this is the best way to establish a WAN if you can make it work in your budget.  Qwest Metro Optical Ethernet product has had huge success.  With this offering you can connect your offices nationwide via ports that range from 5 Mb all the way up to 1 Gb (or 1,000 Mb).  The beauty of ethernet is that you&#8217;re not putting the burden on the routers like you would if you bonded T&#8217;s.  If you&#8217;re looking for screaming Internet access check out ELA or Ethernet Lan Access &#8211; this is Internet over the QMOE network.  For all things Internet check out my <a href="http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/01/internet-access/" target="_blank">posting from last week</a>.</p>
<p>Both Verizon and AT&amp;T have similar ethernet offerings to Qwest in their respective regions, but carriers like TW Telecom, XO, Integra, and Paetec are beginning to come to life with their EoC or Ethernet over copper products.  If your company is a bit more cost conscious you may want to check out these offerings.  I&#8217;ve found a great deal of competence with this technology at the Tier II level.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that ethernet will be the dominant WAN for a great many years to come.  With offerings up to 1 GB on fiber provisions it&#8217;s difficult to see what applications will eat into that large bandwidth.  But as time has shown, we&#8217;ll create apps that will eat it all up (eventually).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cottonwoodcomm.com/2010/01/thoughts-on-wan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

